{"id":"W2063761998","doi":"10.1177/0170840604045092","title":"The Characteristics of Chinese Personal Ties (Guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Guanxi; Closeness; China; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Social psychology; Unit (ring theory); Family ties; Strong ties; Interpersonal ties; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Law; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148584,0.0002035154,0.0001919077,0.001050585,0.001413866,0.0007933344,0.0003299164,0.0002047684,0.001740815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002606473,0.0001738727,0.0001921925,0.002082904,0.0009621219,0.0005887931,0.0009356809,0.0002761919,0.0001336834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001001703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001209352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1169484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1788198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995072,0.0001390121,0.00005118153,0.00006695497,0.0001088888,0.000126697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961068,0.0007297516,0.001634774,0.0002235879,0.0004464117,0.0008587684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003884797,0.00002272228,0.9849976,0.00006356572,0.00005142649,0.0001887479,0.008991327,0.00002947123,0.0001208741,0.000192852,0.0001636236,0.005139063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001456211,0.00002445997,0.9934789,0.00001983939,0.0000111646,0.00004193087,0.005930183,0.00003117575,0.00002615814,0.00002131735,0.0004103902,0.000003040305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986168,0.0002416889,0.00001449474,0.00004548515,0.000002341499,0.000004718343,0.00005948931,3.263232e-7,0.001014665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994486,0.0002793679,0.00001538902,0.00001762777,0.000001962679,0.000004164126,0.00004701502,4.323311e-7,0.0001854852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1169484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2325353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03721263178069389,"score_gpt":0.3195014995990089,"score_spread":0.282288867818315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}