{"id":"W2063761998","doi":"10.1177/0170840604045092","title":"The Characteristics of Chinese Personal Ties (Guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Guanxi; Closeness; China; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Social psychology; Unit (ring theory); Family ties; Strong ties; Interpersonal ties; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Law; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003340417,0.0001039812,0.0001909648,0.00002339038,0.0008652395,0.00005944229,0.0002231169,0.00005052413,0.00004737575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003626429,0.00007271914,0.00002561994,0.0005045229,0.0005630262,0.0002302845,0.00009716306,0.00007602241,0.00003199768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001254553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000256345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001303323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998995,0.00008716969,0.0002041382,0.0001560282,0.0003869756,0.0001706748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984766,0.0005951806,0.000170963,0.0001248612,0.0006008863,0.00003149452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004953241,0.00001659693,0.8474289,0.00001074999,0.00006453536,7.773314e-7,0.1506065,0.000004142597,0.000406255,0.0006354513,0.0002759611,0.0005451905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080659,0.00001290394,0.9357191,0.0001238691,0.00001742153,2.045692e-7,0.06185732,4.828577e-7,0.0001917305,0.001437002,0.0004316669,0.0001001923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873622,0.00816007,0.0001389784,0.003243736,0.0005623431,0.0001077301,0.000009794568,0.00007764302,0.0003374825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722455,0.026702,0.0001224466,0.00004314006,0.0004548737,0.000003912285,0.000003973681,0.00001328563,0.0004109115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08874918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.665481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03721263178069389,"score_gpt":0.3195014995990089,"score_spread":0.282288867818315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}