{"id":"W2063877999","doi":"10.5840/beq200414321","title":"An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Dilemma; Audit; Normalization (sociology); Ethical dilemma; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Accounting; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01923468,0.0002252105,0.0004652342,0.0003907258,0.0004651637,0.0001526064,0.0006964473,0.000958316,0.00001203216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01445337,0.0001205664,0.00008438605,0.002020715,0.001168329,0.0003227593,0.00003526712,0.002174185,0.000009648803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006723122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000647761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008096021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006683402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936858,0.002181592,0.001130469,0.0005010621,0.00223053,0.0002704922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869502,0.01012322,0.0008593166,0.00063232,0.001361142,0.00007384981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001134757,0.0002799556,0.1026344,0.000597267,0.00002977994,0.00001477335,0.4241872,0.02397335,0.03315571,0.388414,0.0002036548,0.02537522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001203437,0.0009248327,0.8686987,0.001054397,0.00002221554,0.000006040939,0.01156957,0.0003727452,0.00187569,0.1139712,0.00004474837,0.0002564388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693505,0.00001309463,0.001064788,0.02823731,0.0009699657,0.0002492256,0.000006177236,0.0000234701,0.00008550685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988452,0.000003746115,0.0004570884,0.0003437,0.0002814285,0.00003031763,0.00001447185,0.00001857531,0.000005539282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08761001831235642,"score_gpt":0.4075835983556798,"score_spread":0.3199735800433234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}