{"id":"W2063877999","doi":"10.5840/beq200414321","title":"An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Dilemma; Audit; Normalization (sociology); Ethical dilemma; Viewpoints; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Accounting; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02334855,0.0005274002,0.0006528775,0.001428009,0.001912956,0.002587897,0.001473382,0.001802458,0.006497861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1721056,0.0004320798,0.00102521,0.0008274131,0.003984052,0.002507015,0.003050192,0.002176469,0.0004306704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003339168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00209315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003320205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00156932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9656426,0.02820226,0.0007295439,0.001621718,0.003041327,0.0007624733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4590465,0.498883,0.02434296,0.007618546,0.006957966,0.00315099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01104937,0.01092288,0.7008933,0.001112703,0.001135838,0.001303488,0.09509321,0.01771525,0.01271876,0.04250379,0.001995403,0.1035561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00245334,0.007285349,0.7077799,0.0004331874,0.001444771,0.0004113915,0.0292303,0.1566224,0.0123163,0.07501888,0.006689679,0.0003143881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848666,0.00006935026,0.003105182,0.0004391075,0.0000290732,0.0001387151,0.00002153922,0.00002494772,0.01130538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985632,0.00002657529,0.00101299,0.00005297091,0.00001778551,0.00008956064,0.000009915346,0.000008805763,0.0002182333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02334855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1234804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08761001831235642,"score_gpt":0.4075835983556798,"score_spread":0.3199735800433234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}