{"id":"W2063901699","doi":"10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.09.075","title":"The identification of neurotensin NTS1 receptor partial agonists through a ligand-based virtual screening approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters","topic":"Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Neurotensin; Virtual screening; Ligand (biochemistry); Agonist; Partial agonist; Identification (biology); Receptor; Pharmacology; Computational biology; Combinatorial chemistry; Stereochemistry; Biochemistry; Drug discovery; Neuropeptide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004694625,0.0007540193,0.001252365,0.0009069355,0.0004165279,0.0008805337,0.0006971771,0.0004223112,0.001560552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007394468,0.0002650907,0.0007029517,0.0005963239,0.0002229274,0.0003325557,0.0005128351,0.0003303338,0.0002220206],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004035885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007187346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001969434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003108182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997111,0.0001340357,0.00001429819,0.00003002152,0.00007794656,0.00003260294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998299,0.0001002888,0.00001531132,0.00001132967,0.00002516127,0.00001806021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002209125,0.001293281,0.005365276,0.0005745033,0.000914356,0.0009041486,0.0001092714,0.577763,0.1267843,0.004452388,0.002938027,0.2766925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002606013,0.0008694989,0.001441808,0.00001211983,0.0003478793,0.0003343115,0.00005859591,0.9619169,0.03130888,0.001318218,0.002092628,0.00003856107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717391,0.001865613,0.1109213,0.000506462,0.00004920241,0.0006273612,0.001279336,0.002061659,0.01095002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9469023,0.0005083435,0.05008528,0.0001371323,0.000009803905,0.0001875819,0.000814958,0.00002572414,0.001328895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001969434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005220532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03960897490759661,"score_gpt":0.2439014313957212,"score_spread":0.2042924564881246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}