{"id":"W2063946157","doi":"10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00243-4","title":"The use of passive sampling to monitor forest exposure to O3, NO2 and SO2: a review and some case studies.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Air pollution; Sampling (signal processing); Forest health; Pollutant; Passive sampling; Air pollutants; Pollution; Ozone; Air monitoring; Tree canopy; Atmospheric sciences; Canopy; Meteorology; Environmental engineering; Geography; Ecology; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002996103,0.001452046,0.003162771,0.004155387,0.0002547644,0.001043031,0.001926036,0.001472791,0.001226179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003115509,0.0004826693,0.0009726611,0.003503107,0.0007807051,0.001279462,0.0005658366,0.0008846973,0.001085675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006984607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001455789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003458495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006300733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988695,0.0003023106,0.0001639018,0.000279482,0.0003415926,0.00004320456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974872,0.001589838,0.0002535781,0.00007699724,0.0005359465,0.00005643368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001379882,0.00006413832,0.001351332,0.02402048,0.0002156515,0.0003848583,0.0001050208,0.0002613435,0.003906706,0.000594846,0.004238631,0.9647191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008512427,0.001089714,0.01888992,0.01691455,0.001792116,0.01332952,0.0007021906,0.000434656,0.01400119,0.002160457,0.9304166,0.0001840699],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003167917,0.9984499,0.0005472893,0.0000968003,0.00007480632,0.0000118646,0.00002977676,0.000005390381,0.0004672672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002093114,0.9964161,0.0009168704,0.0001215941,0.00005940023,0.0000209863,0.00004387235,0.000002827925,0.0003252148],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004155387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01584512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08009502497084432,"score_gpt":0.2890294819203563,"score_spread":0.208934456949512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}