{"id":"W2064012677","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.023","title":"Determining in situ periphyton community responses to nutrient and atrazine gradients via pigment analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Periphyton; Nutrient; Atrazine; Environmental science; In situ; Environmental chemistry; Ecology; Chemistry; Biology; Pesticide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001678653,0.0003061114,0.0003529649,0.0002967655,0.0002391716,0.0004344663,0.0002267481,0.0004016571,0.0005487046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002256004,0.0002235071,0.0002298201,0.0002871923,0.0002147974,0.0002691364,0.0003437862,0.000511103,0.0002224734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002514422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001752372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001818903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003878064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997814,0.00002597712,0.00001048506,0.0001076264,0.0000418418,0.00003267203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997614,0.00004070771,0.00008056162,0.00001780007,0.00006333131,0.00003622256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005684401,0.0000155324,0.00297977,0.00001616378,0.000005984736,0.000006810084,0.00004040508,0.00003248612,0.996151,0.000006451834,0.000005496801,0.0006831235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002327084,0.001021735,0.3916545,0.00001600621,0.00007706755,0.0001688719,0.0003064182,0.00384955,0.6013625,0.0001084577,0.001390275,0.00002133055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995949,0.0001694567,0.002874253,0.00001365026,0.000004390281,0.00003048593,0.000321062,0.00003241248,0.0006052701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839882,0.0004698792,0.0126622,0.000100416,0.000009927753,0.0001928093,0.0008616725,0.00003236516,0.001682582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001818903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003616631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01864016633506334,"score_gpt":0.2335679941418928,"score_spread":0.2149278278068295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}