{"id":"W2064052594","doi":"10.5376/ijh.2013.03.0020","title":"Working Performance of HOPCOMS- in Karnataka an Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Horticulture","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002081443,0.0002556259,0.0001516266,0.001935482,0.001027131,0.001210926,0.0006990793,0.0003148957,0.0107882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007304696,0.0001820768,0.0002723737,0.002237103,0.0003447023,0.000402026,0.001209715,0.0003821551,0.003312059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001678941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002446321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09658418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1605772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996907,0.00002772326,0.00002088108,0.00004721429,0.00005629649,0.0001573847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988477,0.0001165246,0.0001700549,0.00004317207,0.0002510796,0.0005714417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001036048,0.0001202604,0.9621484,0.0001200965,0.00002669736,0.0003916745,0.006022555,0.0001440304,0.0004461228,0.0004770198,0.007467686,0.02253183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002598208,0.00004550365,0.9870844,0.00002614505,0.000007256716,0.00007448771,0.008343692,0.0000618035,0.00006460369,0.00001960467,0.004263415,0.000006400696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812283,0.0002376216,0.00002853133,0.0003321799,0.00002773346,0.00003549187,0.004871084,0.00001894481,0.0132201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837356,0.0003009028,0.00005561472,0.0001096242,0.00001260161,0.00004338257,0.002959823,0.000008507948,0.01277388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09658418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.192044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01328778086842694,"score_gpt":0.2274679224048569,"score_spread":0.21418014153643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}