{"id":"W2064066993","doi":"10.1007/s11218-007-9013-3","title":"The Double Cohort retention and academic success comparison: are students in the new Ontario secondary school program disadvantaged?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychology of Education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Socioeconomic status; Graduation (instrument); Psychology; Cohort; Academic achievement; Sociology of Education; Test (biology); Higher education; Government (linguistics); Medical education; Mathematics education; Demography; Pedagogy; Medicine; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588144,0.0003991084,0.0008838098,0.001669121,0.004235369,0.001983899,0.001442528,0.001231331,0.00411949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003450502,0.0003609548,0.001042855,0.001817097,0.001038942,0.001138688,0.001960142,0.001118513,0.0004634797],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00464178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01031619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7900925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8925672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998555,0.000176158,0.00005552783,0.0001520156,0.0002817468,0.0007795558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975146,0.0002029986,0.0005618985,0.0001732112,0.0004485817,0.001098828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001642128,0.0004337138,0.9879786,0.00001657932,0.0001155323,0.0001855694,0.003023315,0.00001819826,0.0004833957,0.0002187816,0.001061614,0.004822605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006407429,0.0003565111,0.9917732,0.00001531662,0.00009848774,0.00004178836,0.006637996,0.00004591069,0.0000768089,0.00005287993,0.0008266427,0.0000104498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975415,0.0001551982,0.00001412267,0.0002698797,0.00002607459,0.00002222059,0.000326794,0.0000017268,0.00164248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970228,0.00009796537,0.00002172565,0.0001495725,0.00001404808,0.00002222122,0.0003774808,0.000002557341,0.0022916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4222873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06556548294972793,"score_gpt":0.5364407746726351,"score_spread":0.4708752917229072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}