{"id":"W2064249599","doi":"10.1139/l06-080","title":"Comparison of Weibull and normal distributions for concrete compressive strengths","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Rock Mechanics and Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Goodness of fit; Compressive strength; Weibull modulus; Mathematics; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Structural engineering; Engineering; Materials science; Mathematical analysis; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01131598,0.0007043566,0.0006203992,0.003321332,0.0004467998,0.001015817,0.001196061,0.0007429754,0.002296274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03456231,0.0003605266,0.000864626,0.002200272,0.0008592133,0.001949749,0.0006571336,0.0007836131,0.001274181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001315154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008393608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003768679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002994961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966618,0.0008899487,0.0001902865,0.0005013649,0.001500464,0.0002560775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747073,0.01516758,0.001369939,0.002620588,0.005798497,0.0003360138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002069427,0.0002388194,0.100369,0.0005524358,0.0005161329,0.00076493,0.001629266,0.6087819,0.01091055,0.05006072,0.007116525,0.2169903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001040716,0.0006111866,0.1586992,0.0001807066,0.0001248044,0.001418841,0.001013511,0.7590284,0.008480564,0.05026099,0.01970648,0.0003712329],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4554312,0.001772843,0.5246717,0.0004036791,0.0001642891,0.0004078852,0.002018931,0.002924863,0.01220459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678836,0.0005544822,0.02642309,0.00006069286,0.00004808243,0.0002097684,0.002373795,0.0002927048,0.002153705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01131598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05984527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007982496891590876,"score_gpt":0.2110935043939818,"score_spread":0.203111007502391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}