{"id":"W2064403444","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00723.x","title":"Comparison of alternate cover test reliability at near in non‐strabismus between experienced and novice examiners","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","topic":"Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Limits of agreement; Eye tracking; Optometry; Strabismus; Reliability (semiconductor); Heterophoria; Audiology; Medicine; Test (biology); Ophthalmology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Nuclear medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002159,0.0004559467,0.0003502604,0.001560402,0.0002923002,0.0005608,0.000476401,0.0006019814,0.002595733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01441831,0.0002806982,0.0005026162,0.0003918202,0.0004260807,0.0008146519,0.001103717,0.0003847886,0.0006206287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002026313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001289505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002524534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983788,0.0004100295,0.0002660825,0.0003058303,0.0004521379,0.0001871706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841414,0.007712008,0.002311266,0.0009910227,0.003547571,0.001296625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004032002,0.0002439198,0.964343,0.00009047653,0.0001811873,0.0003526985,0.001808526,0.000178661,0.01142275,0.00006841815,0.0004162788,0.01686209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004044693,0.001460375,0.995017,0.00001334705,0.00004006239,0.0007960696,0.0005222856,0.0003967007,0.001434344,0.00003382692,0.0002363224,0.000009319524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989079,0.00008630953,0.0001838706,0.000009886254,0.00001296417,0.000006507996,0.00005756192,0.00001010401,0.0007249381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990494,0.00004086029,0.0003212134,0.00001916037,0.00001123599,0.000007395185,0.0001372438,0.000007138884,0.0004064353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002595733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01141804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0401107728318728,"score_gpt":0.3514636709526867,"score_spread":0.3113528981208138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}