{"id":"W2064420409","doi":"10.1186/1753-6561-5-s9-s111","title":"Are quantitative trait-dependent sampling designs cost-effective for analysis of rare and common variants?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Proceedings","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Mitacs","keywords":"Sample size determination; Replicate; Statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Statistical power; Trait; Genetic association; Type I and type II errors; Weighting; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Data mining; Computer science; Computational biology; Genetics; Biology; Medicine; Mathematics; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Machine learning; Genotype; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004460073,0.000118751,0.0003328575,0.00009743614,0.00007543584,0.00000820196,0.00009756567,0.0001471875,0.00000820323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005934342,0.0001107452,0.0001195769,0.0001540842,0.00006172993,0.00000468269,0.00005159244,0.00004480473,4.112745e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001315401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001853117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004349416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001349282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991977,0.00002714576,0.0002370209,0.000298276,0.00005210019,0.0001878108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991727,0.00009235914,0.0003649243,0.00007631162,0.0002403556,0.00005329655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003443893,0.0001084807,0.9138562,0.00008925337,0.001171505,1.984684e-7,0.001227925,0.00008606116,0.07961474,0.001902739,0.0002046738,0.001393819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005171125,0.0004377333,0.9816685,0.00001303484,0.0006343835,0.000002268342,0.001982791,0.001599444,0.01194195,0.0008859808,0.0001572969,0.0001595144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303435,0.000200241,0.06829429,0.00001564048,0.00002745927,0.000713687,0.0001255723,0.000006612335,0.0002730245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737195,0.00002628658,0.02579764,0.00006952089,0.0000243256,0.0002628216,0.00004662974,0.00001200069,0.00004125691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06781227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4516057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1409899529376618,"score_gpt":0.3494570708936295,"score_spread":0.2084671179559677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}