{"id":"W2064446468","doi":"10.1007/s00256-009-0835-2","title":"A comparison of conventional maximum intensity projection with a new depth-specific topographic mapping technique in the CT analysis of proximal tibial subchondral bone density","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Skeletal Radiology","topic":"Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Arthritis Network; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Medicine; Subchondral bone; Bone density; Computed tomography; Nuclear medicine; Tomography; Anatomy; Cadaver; Bone mineral; Quantitative computed tomography; Osteoarthritis; Radiology; Osteoporosis; Articular cartilage; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002302548,0.0003439688,0.0002852477,0.001630193,0.0001795905,0.0007421086,0.0005701195,0.0007983179,0.001906547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00484724,0.0005699123,0.0002480065,0.0008983056,0.0004253952,0.001180007,0.0006680736,0.0005627185,0.0002970466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001803723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003216079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001214831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002315638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993168,0.0003079192,0.00004965959,0.00009191398,0.0001992058,0.00003451419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997183,0.00184522,0.0001361084,0.0001811984,0.0005569046,0.00009761391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01192013,0.0002641763,0.07142291,0.001118626,0.0003322259,0.001338939,0.000718418,0.002740183,0.6561709,0.001501621,0.0009233173,0.2515486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008740171,0.00523295,0.6020129,0.0002044507,0.001534113,0.04981966,0.0009374163,0.09929838,0.230113,0.001679942,0.007911815,0.0003814528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7860268,0.005842914,0.2024899,0.0003486075,0.0001296789,0.0001851659,0.0003907333,0.0003250746,0.004261155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8764954,0.002053636,0.1197762,0.0001180468,0.00007431833,0.00007921768,0.0001339356,0.000128471,0.001140801],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002302548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01217717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02546154904596846,"score_gpt":0.2878061363549973,"score_spread":0.2623445873090288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}