{"id":"W2064521288","doi":"10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.11.013","title":"Combined retrospective analysis of 498 rat multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies: On the impact of parameters related to F1 mating and F2 offspring","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reproductive Toxicology","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; National Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Offspring; Reproductive toxicity; Retrospective cohort study; Toxicity; Reproduction; Mating; First generation; Risk assessment; Medicine; Toxicology; Biology; Environmental health; Internal medicine; Zoology; Pregnancy; Computer science; Ecology; Genetics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002909568,0.0005149367,0.0006691298,0.002343457,0.0004102585,0.0005176224,0.0003618894,0.0003100871,0.000751025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002209335,0.0002752631,0.0007545556,0.001449791,0.0003058285,0.0002652837,0.0005822942,0.0002194565,0.0002482985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003288504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004543135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007179386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998054,0.0006596214,0.0002433926,0.0005230717,0.0004059984,0.0001138829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936755,0.001700338,0.001501666,0.001879643,0.001013051,0.0002298221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005506314,0.00005649944,0.9770408,0.00006955233,0.0009681775,0.0002718836,0.0001240079,0.0002006597,0.01128162,0.00004496922,0.0001424148,0.009248741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004828805,0.0003036748,0.9945276,0.000007839816,0.0007001811,0.0006088394,0.00008994048,0.0001287492,0.002483313,0.00002330056,0.001112244,0.00000929829],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935022,0.001790444,0.001602314,0.00001541931,0.000008409749,0.00003513207,0.002226391,0.00002877985,0.0007909332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942006,0.0006215631,0.001069899,0.00004500098,0.00001158313,0.00004040122,0.003412379,0.00002543635,0.0005731421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004254906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01538748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03070748537722106,"score_gpt":0.3788540131453372,"score_spread":0.3481465277681162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}