{"id":"W2064615049","doi":"10.1007/s10661-007-9705-3","title":"Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stratified sampling; Municipal solid waste; Sample (material); Population; Food waste; Composition (language); Household waste; Geography; Socioeconomics; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Waste management; Engineering; Economics; Demography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001289439,0.0003548889,0.0004018272,0.001292531,0.00225494,0.0009821301,0.0008013727,0.001251006,0.002514033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003355752,0.0002935463,0.0006961517,0.002086116,0.0009426608,0.0007730869,0.0008164043,0.0006185306,0.0002672024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001483655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008562217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01999091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03390861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993032,0.0003798999,0.00003197237,0.00004353429,0.0001198881,0.0001215528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972085,0.002107741,0.0002457901,0.0001272722,0.0001788368,0.0001318271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001953698,0.00918332,0.8457257,0.0002450916,0.000272972,0.05034348,0.01982929,0.01505918,0.00548437,0.005118839,0.001120261,0.04566377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004442009,0.005551972,0.7168207,0.0001484277,0.0006574156,0.05068546,0.1109857,0.07539189,0.021889,0.00698668,0.01015847,0.0002800896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987745,0.00003202785,0.0002800157,0.00005041525,0.000001094658,0.00001642748,0.00004556502,0.000003602165,0.0007962661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984847,0.0001014948,0.0007417506,0.00001078968,0.000002000227,0.00001497536,0.00004102362,0.000004121096,0.0005991387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01999091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03974915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02481018434863039,"score_gpt":0.2987008527180184,"score_spread":0.273890668369388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}