{"id":"W2064615049","doi":"10.1007/s10661-007-9705-3","title":"Relation of waste generation and composition to socio-economic factors: a case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stratified sampling; Municipal solid waste; Sample (material); Population; Food waste; Composition (language); Household waste; Geography; Socioeconomics; Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Waste management; Engineering; Economics; Demography; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003376609,0.0001270062,0.0001178752,0.00004116497,0.0001787647,0.00002724117,0.00004592996,0.00003076669,0.00004976383],"category_scores_gemma":[8.544578e-7,0.0001279453,0.00001767092,0.00002968774,0.00005234727,0.0001582384,0.000252048,0.000077884,0.000007291824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004459302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001395681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008950886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000374919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990925,0.00004565057,0.0002427212,0.0002755903,0.0001899049,0.0001536655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996348,0.00002854708,0.00008485478,0.0001444491,5.583294e-7,0.0001067637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007738115,0.0002172991,0.9453024,0.000004653399,0.00002315269,0.00003953946,0.002902973,0.01744854,0.02799152,0.00001230698,0.000008205248,0.00604165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005060777,0.0004308216,0.9609124,0.00001129813,0.00004231953,0.00002524522,0.02669982,0.005126346,0.005963201,0.000008351084,0.00007712784,0.000196974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982283,0.00001710659,0.0007837653,0.00002115251,0.0001748177,0.0004465452,0.000003297773,0.00000858636,0.0003164725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979571,0.00001394862,0.001858995,0.000005157108,0.00008336332,0.0000138411,0.00000554863,0.00001097591,0.00005107091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02379685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5217457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02481018434863039,"score_gpt":0.2987008527180184,"score_spread":0.273890668369388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}