{"id":"W2064642572","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.12.004","title":"Designing priors for robust Bayesian optimal experimental design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Prior probability; Process (computing); Computer science; Design of experiments; Bayesian probability; Engineering design process; Process modeling; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Work in process; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01173447,0.0003075964,0.0008294125,0.0004479735,0.0002467997,0.0003379961,0.001090548,0.0001461707,0.0003079908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041938,0.0002203463,0.0004049605,0.0004546794,0.000124666,0.0022128,0.00004379349,0.0002838597,0.00002642329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001564155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000272013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.358879e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.464458e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949181,0.000764687,0.001552496,0.0003129348,0.001741696,0.0007100689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938369,0.002998339,0.001436286,0.0002901331,0.0008984535,0.0005399204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008281742,0.001865577,0.006035115,0.00004150882,0.0004241278,0.00005206174,0.01334177,0.11804,0.8076451,0.0007931613,0.008048866,0.03543095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008909639,0.003084147,0.0004237559,0.00009626774,0.000171422,0.0005357183,0.01592675,0.07897729,0.8881717,0.001558096,0.001425437,0.0007197862],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01715631,0.003328886,0.9774506,0.0001903597,0.0008602712,0.0006990496,0.000004549595,0.00002157069,0.0002883717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5517708,0.000001746744,0.447449,0.0001644973,0.0004505036,0.00003649963,1.477542e-7,0.00002692597,0.00009988886],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.898546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1733677444323993,"score_gpt":0.451264019980269,"score_spread":0.2778962755478697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}