{"id":"W2064662293","doi":"10.1111/jbi.12340","title":"Assessing coastal species distribution models through the integration of terrestrial, oceanic and atmospheric data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biogeography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Environment Canada; British Columbia Innovation Council","keywords":"Environmental science; Overfitting; Environmental data; Generalized additive model; Shore; Species distribution; Habitat; Physical geography; Scale (ratio); Terrestrial ecosystem; Ecology; Geography; Oceanography; Ecosystem; Cartography; Computer science; Statistics; Geology; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005081344,0.00009251404,0.0001568429,0.000008392793,0.0001232066,0.0001113976,0.000323044,0.0000429842,0.000598094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007479804,0.00005737348,0.00008657692,0.0003397151,0.0003585203,0.0009973329,0.0001795673,0.0001127995,0.000002975343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003653095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007643446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001542773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007297972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.00008369713,0.0003407139,0.000120908,0.0003193725,0.0001227826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.00007144151,0.0004281136,0.0002413199,0.00002426009,0.00004337825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008522648,0.00202301,0.49744,0.0001143016,0.0006091832,0.00002034931,0.003572911,0.001050974,0.1606132,0.04280825,0.1666124,0.1242832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001209207,0.0004231895,0.899937,0.00009823176,0.0001816416,0.00008384271,0.009682954,0.009486708,0.002195975,0.004952171,0.07148022,0.0002688973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572592,0.0002495844,0.0383179,0.000674353,0.0002420222,0.00008093467,0.0002168554,0.0000076613,0.002951494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987524,0.0004988801,0.0004818653,0.00005806023,0.00006640722,4.131176e-7,0.0001320351,0.000004104945,0.000005814209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.402497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.654871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06699555319766891,"score_gpt":0.2845224163470655,"score_spread":0.2175268631493966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}