{"id":"W2064688203","doi":"10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.087","title":"Continuous flow azide formation: Optimization and scale-up","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemical Engineering Journal","topic":"Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Radboud Universiteit","keywords":"Benzylamine; Azide; Microreactor; Reagent; Chemistry; Sulfonyl; Continuous reactor; Explosive material; Continuous flow; Imidazole; Hydrochloride; Flow chemistry; Organic chemistry; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001708538,0.0001328436,0.0001294138,0.0001053692,0.00004282568,0.00007139766,0.00009496514,0.0001244178,0.00005489998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005557251,0.0001329484,0.00002718181,0.000200068,0.0000323937,0.0002797741,0.00002150844,0.0006115689,0.000003545077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004474304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008411401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.38588e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.087789e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993504,0.00000190409,0.000278147,0.00007773377,0.0001079593,0.0001838068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996726,0.00001539497,0.00003371365,0.00009296607,0.0001157783,0.00006954736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002291532,0.00000407225,0.00001287127,0.00003454973,0.00001050626,0.000002634743,0.0000909224,0.009294974,0.979191,0.0003535119,0.002688228,0.008314447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002366571,0.000006962668,0.00001866171,0.00002963588,0.000006654189,0.0005888552,0.00001039222,0.3689252,0.6259835,0.00005652228,0.00398369,0.000153298],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07233234,0.0001011737,0.9261779,0.00005143699,0.0006034236,0.00005549592,0.000003180603,0.0003042645,0.0003708276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8492295,0.00002908045,0.1501493,0.00004346359,0.000436809,0.000008169865,0.0000289769,0.00004027347,0.00003438102],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5421477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003714906349280733,"score_gpt":0.1849974637809009,"score_spread":0.1812825574316202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}