{"id":"W2064734223","doi":"10.1080/13504850601057823","title":"Preferences and observed risk premia: an empirical analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics Letters","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Conference Board of Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Capital asset pricing model; Econometrics; Risk premium; Consumption (sociology); Marginal utility; Consumption-based capital asset pricing model; Covariance; Risk aversion (psychology); Constant (computer programming); Asset (computer security); Empirical evidence; Security market line; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Stock market; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005614422,0.0003589333,0.0006498889,0.001009659,0.0004948593,0.001640877,0.001444595,0.0009794071,0.01356908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04711406,0.0004085353,0.0007956048,0.001834795,0.0009249031,0.001619511,0.0008971264,0.00208012,0.001338891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001050892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006821101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01946035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01095204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998779,0.000575571,0.00007400777,0.0002039114,0.0002116422,0.0001557401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9308414,0.05491921,0.006249832,0.00513542,0.001798256,0.001055795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008365013,0.001152195,0.9370548,0.0001083477,0.0005016079,0.0003944782,0.00110147,0.008915731,0.0003364585,0.01174314,0.002121294,0.03573411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001742138,0.0003713518,0.8814175,0.00008882271,0.0003998179,0.000725601,0.001421925,0.09216991,0.0006083613,0.0187445,0.003800927,0.00007704534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936656,0.0005004836,0.002799391,0.0003075402,0.000005802799,0.00003140723,0.000681998,0.00003000359,0.001977701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971928,0.0002631749,0.000602715,0.00004290836,0.00001548373,0.0000138766,0.0007067901,0.00001189077,0.001150363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01946035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04539311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04526953548722565,"score_gpt":0.2256377250540796,"score_spread":0.180368189566854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}