{"id":"W2064779299","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.001","title":"Observing ideal “self-similar” crack growth in experiments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","topic":"Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of Naval Research; California Institute of Technology; Brown University","keywords":"Photoelasticity; Materials science; Crack closure; Stress intensity factor; Mechanics; Fracture mechanics; Ideal (ethics); Stress field; Action (physics); Structural engineering; Ultimate tensile strength; Optics; Composite material; Engineering; Physics; Finite element method; Solid mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003741336,0.0002813463,0.0003377238,0.0002218805,0.0004133269,0.000476579,0.0005613659,0.0009734101,0.002628922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002311503,0.0003318859,0.0001652976,0.0001763184,0.001003166,0.0008442738,0.0006391226,0.0007886231,0.0003315671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002137923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002296606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004892041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005033747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996941,0.00003059925,0.00001574361,0.0000932467,0.0001033991,0.00006289268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986466,0.0004723094,0.000142714,0.0003905293,0.0001977341,0.0001501581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009427468,0.0004092845,0.005255166,0.0001289041,0.00002848639,0.0003917253,0.0003624969,0.01907928,0.9623954,0.004807427,0.0008702061,0.00532889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001960051,0.000937497,0.01928454,0.00002586444,0.00002965223,0.0004867951,0.0002806789,0.3552971,0.6175055,0.004528915,0.001368234,0.00005930273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779295,0.00005608347,0.01814778,0.0001214201,0.00003797056,0.00004747294,0.0001449407,0.000316818,0.003197979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954489,0.00003205471,0.003633257,0.0000349579,0.000008952649,0.00002358489,0.00006409221,0.00003356893,0.000720748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002628922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008794606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004168552209490804,"score_gpt":0.1760903873990854,"score_spread":0.1719218351895946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}