{"id":"W2064813434","doi":"10.1078/1617-1381-00017","title":"Land use history, plant rarity, and protected area adequacy in an intensively managed forest landscape","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Threatened species; Land use; Edaphic; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006914565,0.0001047437,0.0002067779,0.0007938966,0.0006500017,0.0006531377,0.000484092,0.0004534482,0.002185697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002201371,0.0001959791,0.0001827811,0.0006899129,0.0007236358,0.0005431211,0.0004777086,0.0004162377,0.0001568567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004912473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002880586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01699735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05540191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999723,0.000105238,0.00002234565,0.00004244877,0.00002456336,0.00008228972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973994,0.0009066371,0.0007250572,0.0001276394,0.0001161882,0.0007251187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003182789,0.0001864147,0.9971272,0.000002755291,0.00004216279,0.0002180232,0.0002028579,0.0002487182,0.000582976,0.00007906285,0.00006162473,0.0009298914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007858277,0.0001016843,0.9984718,0.000001276598,0.00001485973,0.0002027761,0.000352394,0.000678928,0.0000379147,0.00008747204,0.00004025216,0.00000279573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998728,0.00001110333,0.000006553051,0.00001224431,3.562783e-7,4.841596e-7,0.00001181105,3.388745e-7,0.00008429002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998684,0.000006778178,0.00001225378,0.000006554466,0.000001662946,8.266549e-7,0.00002365539,5.206994e-7,0.0000793753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01699735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03379679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03607925820725724,"score_gpt":0.2368916525373682,"score_spread":0.200812394330111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}