{"id":"W2064819923","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.007","title":"Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: Comparative study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adhesive; Isotropy; Materials science; Adhesive bonding; Nonlinear system; Lap joint; Structural engineering; Table (database); Range (aeronautics); Composite material; Computer science; Engineering; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001764932,0.0001828034,0.0004816476,0.0002857468,0.00006369068,0.00002105671,0.0003614528,0.00006094176,0.0001218849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005766518,0.0001534141,0.0001654695,0.00009985517,0.00009968182,0.0003695267,0.00009309435,0.000242953,0.000006173698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000412585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004083824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003209336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001118462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981905,0.0000636252,0.0007808727,0.0001358733,0.0006897004,0.0001394567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987729,0.0001785996,0.0002471342,0.0001117538,0.0005230621,0.0001665227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002358851,0.005504852,0.03154609,0.00009484093,0.003291602,0.001950949,0.0194642,0.007292107,0.8936734,0.01670622,0.01545943,0.002657428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007935346,0.005576105,0.08390182,0.0007661228,0.0004384287,0.00169791,0.005146002,0.03421443,0.8513091,0.005766646,0.002166217,0.001081928],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979628,0.0003666143,0.0001953712,0.0001414375,0.0003819338,0.000116016,0.00001027919,0.00002545325,0.0008000791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984446,0.0002592714,0.0009978354,0.00003074053,0.0001293253,0.000002249233,0.000001740818,0.00001476724,0.0001195205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05235573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6256044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07127062949019151,"score_gpt":0.3080182893550054,"score_spread":0.2367476598648138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}