{"id":"W2064819923","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.007","title":"Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part II: Comparative study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adhesive; Isotropy; Materials science; Adhesive bonding; Nonlinear system; Lap joint; Structural engineering; Table (database); Range (aeronautics); Composite material; Computer science; Engineering; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005502835,0.0009382693,0.001091658,0.001213444,0.0005582354,0.001248571,0.002490217,0.001886686,0.005592719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128122,0.0005263855,0.0009142128,0.001018867,0.0006322785,0.0009997602,0.0004471053,0.0006166191,0.001730816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007059288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006680834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003699424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002924963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995736,0.0001100752,0.00001748219,0.00005395916,0.0001978735,0.00004683459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993024,0.0002935329,0.0001014859,0.0000688918,0.000216128,0.00001754789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006153968,0.0001601507,0.0004937655,0.000317057,0.0000334461,0.0002465783,0.0003698008,0.9048682,0.01885921,0.05210758,0.0008082518,0.02167444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004389055,0.00005422171,0.0002283932,0.00002312604,0.00001975575,0.00008250985,0.00006714012,0.9914288,0.001736599,0.00460519,0.00173784,0.00001191867],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1481677,0.005269954,0.7740944,0.0002502723,0.0001793427,0.0002139321,0.0002128445,0.0003466799,0.07126488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343094,0.003786431,0.03385559,0.00007411576,0.0001002543,0.0002883097,0.0001560365,0.0001858984,0.027244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005592719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01870954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07127062949019151,"score_gpt":0.3080182893550054,"score_spread":0.2367476598648138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}