{"id":"W2064888302","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2006-98564","title":"Computational Analysis of Effective Microfluidic Mixing Utilizing Surface Heterogeneity Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Microchannel; Mechanics; Electro-osmosis; Finite element method; Zeta potential; Mixing (physics); Microfluidics; Flow (mathematics); Work (physics); Surface charge; Materials science; Flow velocity; Physics; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Thermodynamics; Electrophoresis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003603902,0.0003893157,0.0004678656,0.0004122134,0.0004594025,0.0008046313,0.0006022907,0.0008895268,0.001353246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001349965,0.0002822687,0.000345337,0.0003413759,0.0005879984,0.0006091955,0.0004552341,0.000273466,0.0001234233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007209431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004772952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002421734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998752,0.0000388474,0.000004986114,0.00001621576,0.00003791418,0.00002678499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995152,0.0003142902,0.00004195514,0.00002592232,0.00006784937,0.00003487424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003336314,0.00002195074,0.0003509948,0.00002414679,0.000007789697,0.00005659404,0.00001395273,0.9911738,0.00240885,0.004094474,0.00008660122,0.001727448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005048913,0.00000550127,0.00005530504,7.680526e-7,0.000001319101,0.000003092149,0.000002798825,0.9993129,0.0002658379,0.0002795114,0.00006633023,0.000001639646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864431,0.0004234787,0.1912602,0.0006022086,0.0000905496,0.00008874876,0.0003052615,0.0002627448,0.0205237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716242,0.0001180557,0.02569086,0.00005442442,0.00002324293,0.0001021482,0.00009431135,0.00004562043,0.002246981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004772952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009490371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00441622154825542,"score_gpt":0.2122081161514068,"score_spread":0.2077918946031514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}