{"id":"W2064990832","doi":"10.1103/physreva.82.052336","title":"Numerical estimation of the relative entropy of entanglement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Physics; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Quantum relative entropy; Transpose; Entropy (arrow of time); Approximation error; Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; MATLAB; Quantum mechanics; Algorithm; Statistics; Quantum discord; Mathematics; Quantum; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551729,0.0004478261,0.0004995874,0.000891879,0.0003490817,0.0008525959,0.000968833,0.0007018219,0.003452427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008041007,0.0002915048,0.0002764658,0.0004919865,0.001066746,0.001282622,0.001358642,0.0008645229,0.0006233509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004951042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005880108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003893033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004351701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99949,0.0002152001,0.00002777686,0.00006216801,0.0001719704,0.00003286808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997738,0.00142987,0.0001709265,0.0003406201,0.0002555714,0.00006497693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001903439,0.00005254167,0.0008801536,0.0001438127,0.00003831097,0.00008843382,0.0001043359,0.6994585,0.01160571,0.2125669,0.001508544,0.07336239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008978051,0.00001348233,0.00007287318,0.000006171783,0.00000176092,0.00001771891,0.000004204558,0.9770976,0.001807695,0.02057336,0.0003886623,0.000007410768],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01494914,0.00005495172,0.9820002,0.0001325251,0.00001798487,0.00001996156,0.00003306151,0.0003078216,0.002484379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3632261,0.0001058669,0.6347629,0.00005614213,0.00002615606,0.0001649675,0.000122786,0.0001408416,0.001394232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003452427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01154947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008007041490492634,"score_gpt":0.2823983532406141,"score_spread":0.2743913117501214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}