{"id":"W2065092410","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2014.05.001","title":"Assessing carbon storage and sequestration by Canada's urban forests using high resolution earth observation data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban forestry & urban greening","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Carbon sequestration; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Environmental science; Carbon sink; Climate change; Urban forest; Urban forestry; Land use; Land cover; Environmental protection; Geography; Forestry; Agroforestry; Carbon dioxide; Kyoto Protocol; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500086,0.0004504328,0.0002847597,0.001214445,0.001543807,0.001537094,0.0007073127,0.0004869556,0.0009378894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001246374,0.0002450786,0.0004441366,0.003371009,0.0003986459,0.0005880404,0.000462386,0.0003547874,0.0001172932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03146778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03157549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997149,0.00001942091,0.00001203907,0.00004357387,0.0001129665,0.00009702966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991918,0.00009259908,0.00006742203,0.00002653507,0.0005032675,0.0001183256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003727759,0.0002174762,0.8363781,0.0002200412,0.0005144948,0.0002631932,0.0006354129,0.09666924,0.003576787,0.002472581,0.007311581,0.05136834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007344615,0.00003124931,0.8812448,0.00006292501,0.0002341467,0.00003561661,0.001544698,0.1076449,0.002318981,0.0005199824,0.006220574,0.00006874695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895107,0.000455391,0.0004147062,0.0003563306,0.000008348226,0.00002826615,0.006402172,0.00005626801,0.002767922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954932,0.0002933278,0.0009416208,0.00003650463,0.000003342362,0.00001024283,0.002256747,0.000008129119,0.0009569391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03146778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2283158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04267812410366113,"score_gpt":0.2578000468707855,"score_spread":0.2151219227671244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}