{"id":"W2065152567","doi":"10.1167/11.11.210","title":"Reward probability and magnitude in saccadic decisions under risk: measuring bias and sensitivity to expected value","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vision","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prospect theory; Statistics; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Sensitivity (control systems); Cumulative prospect theory; Econometrics; Magnitude (astronomy); Expected value; Function (biology); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125191,0.0004885969,0.0002886961,0.0005711915,0.00008955166,0.0004750822,0.000168001,0.000535571,0.0021783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007037753,0.0002070568,0.0001824169,0.0002550563,0.00035549,0.0003996588,0.0004202486,0.0003157369,0.0002743937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001658404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001680989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008030529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007216829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995203,0.000136091,0.00004775832,0.0001237417,0.0001341585,0.00003794286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972765,0.001526859,0.0006270607,0.0002014434,0.0001508539,0.0002172403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007739433,0.000797658,0.5640361,0.0003205432,0.0003229412,0.0002996617,0.001004399,0.005038484,0.3462964,0.0004348084,0.0003335821,0.07337607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001029024,0.002150072,0.9745246,0.00001571221,0.00005361006,0.0003318877,0.00011099,0.007347451,0.01435751,0.0007409931,0.0002333982,0.00003099086],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966608,0.000108715,0.002524687,0.00002192038,0.000006729702,0.00003846979,0.0001119789,0.00002686403,0.0004998491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977632,0.00006467575,0.001760089,0.00002693956,0.00000748537,0.00003279265,0.00009411084,0.00001112734,0.0002395765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007287204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5152942206225273,"score_gpt":0.4183220649513515,"score_spread":0.09697215567117573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}