{"id":"W2065257155","doi":"10.1063/1.1518683","title":"A revised experimental absolute magnetic shielding scale for oxygen","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Atmospheric Ozone and Climate","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Alberta","keywords":"Electromagnetic shielding; Oxygen; Chemistry; Isotropy; Carbon monoxide; Monoxide; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Ab initio; Constant (computer programming); Ab initio quantum chemistry methods; Absolute scale; Atomic physics; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Materials science; Physics; Molecule; Inorganic chemistry; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001444219,0.00007709449,0.0001477293,0.000002491769,0.00005947743,0.00002084075,0.000217594,0.00002662103,0.0009474793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001228631,0.00004731864,0.0001051345,0.00007478348,0.00005913607,0.0001161122,0.000008164353,0.0001160364,0.0000418865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004319827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006440121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007490371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.501766e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993836,0.00001978949,0.0002060619,0.00005403309,0.0001680108,0.0001685558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995449,0.0001339775,0.000133451,0.0000870896,0.00002945911,0.00007116546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009834432,0.0004500663,0.003556049,0.0001300108,0.0001510413,0.00001525706,0.006606617,0.002243382,0.7471648,0.000100554,0.03639699,0.2022018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009411412,0.004654754,0.007039771,0.0005152497,0.0009951132,0.0006638561,0.00469267,0.2505314,0.6569449,0.02702018,0.03560249,0.001928254],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943175,0.002190316,0.0004092486,0.0003121305,0.00009940813,0.00007416336,0.000004989948,0.00000625016,0.002586041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971824,0.0001047858,0.001837877,0.0002839929,0.0004809142,2.700702e-7,0.000001455736,0.000003675948,0.0001046589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.248288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02225027735028802,"score_gpt":0.2239813341158332,"score_spread":0.2017310567655451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}