{"id":"W2065288011","doi":"10.1007/s001990100227","title":"Continuity of the first price auction Nash equilibrium correspondence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Revenue equivalence; Nash equilibrium; Comparative statics; Auction theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Generalized second-price auction; Economics; Valuation (finance); Sequential equilibrium; Robustness (evolution); Common value auction; Computer science; Best response; Equilibrium selection; Microeconomics; Game theory; Repeated game","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190993,0.0004909592,0.001292125,0.002187314,0.001924269,0.00490545,0.001665788,0.002269937,0.01387565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01099257,0.000601205,0.0009372355,0.001661857,0.002443806,0.006768369,0.002129925,0.004119067,0.001502181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00181982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001383449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009568435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004517288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998539,0.0004942515,0.00005557419,0.0003404137,0.0003213301,0.0002494704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943156,0.003567017,0.0004235444,0.0003739104,0.0008697408,0.0004501595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002777058,0.00002550241,0.000127795,0.00001972179,0.000005894101,0.00004977222,0.0001316159,0.001212319,0.0003030418,0.9944544,0.0007924546,0.00284964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002023834,0.00001476814,0.0001898063,0.00000864216,0.000004782518,0.0001151594,0.00005938302,0.009655137,0.0002452066,0.9878034,0.001874771,0.00000871186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.302723,0.001484667,0.3627869,0.007712266,0.0003571513,0.0001446399,0.0006180221,0.0004379792,0.3237354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389883,0.0008761008,0.02711188,0.0004218208,0.0003180793,0.0001186551,0.0002266837,0.00009877415,0.03183955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01387565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04641861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05024453163854063,"score_gpt":0.300175081775395,"score_spread":0.2499305501368544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}