{"id":"W2065320444","doi":"10.1007/s11606-012-2030-8","title":"Chapter 5: Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality in Medical Test Studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality","keywords":"Medicine; Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Systematic review; Quality (philosophy); Internal validity; Categorization; Publication bias; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4236449,0.002801698,0.006725763,0.01592915,0.002869515,0.01441789,0.007181749,0.008259996,0.01080362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6669266,0.003071362,0.01438023,0.01329486,0.007257502,0.009550586,0.007173424,0.008872739,0.002191125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01027914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02489164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007854336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.348246,0.4645043,0.09645398,0.007040235,0.08220769,0.001547821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1454957,0.7808826,0.02627406,0.01144864,0.0350954,0.0008035318],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005512449,0.0001789928,0.01117349,0.2332505,0.0115282,0.000282562,0.009465235,0.005029742,0.001320389,0.1930964,0.1539783,0.3801449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005241864,0.0005735278,0.01327475,0.3829564,0.009476868,0.001124589,0.002630841,0.009613014,0.004013409,0.251281,0.3239276,0.0006038586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004014976,0.2425535,0.5786649,0.07534427,0.01121364,0.04757503,0.006675691,0.001077449,0.03288058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03206298,0.07932916,0.8192275,0.01624665,0.003947122,0.04293699,0.001560854,0.000441384,0.004247429],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5763551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7107485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8247082700658515,"score_gpt":0.6359344799048843,"score_spread":0.1887737901609672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}