{"id":"W2065446059","doi":"10.1109/scc.2010.54","title":"Applying Bargaining Game Theory to Web Services Negotiation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Computer science; Web service; Service provider; Service (business); Game theory; Nash equilibrium; WS-Policy; Service level; Service-level agreement; Bargaining problem; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Business; Microeconomics; Quality of service; Marketing; Economics; Web development; Telecommunications; Web application security; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005889284,0.001131078,0.00149294,0.00181065,0.00178297,0.003662878,0.002601811,0.002413051,0.007171478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01280968,0.0007763255,0.00158865,0.002694164,0.004313871,0.004456758,0.002859097,0.003061837,0.0009315362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003421733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005521082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003435927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933466,0.004520814,0.00026329,0.0004062483,0.001037993,0.0004251586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955265,0.003584645,0.0002015963,0.0002116577,0.0003455833,0.0001300313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009942247,0.00001865879,0.00008760904,0.00005334549,0.00002113372,0.00007713141,0.0001436463,0.07989497,0.00013201,0.9106627,0.0006560463,0.008242842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001476656,0.0000129126,0.00004171508,0.00002650242,0.000007256327,0.00002686638,0.00007618811,0.2069671,0.0001018431,0.7889981,0.003713742,0.00001293639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004023471,0.0007561165,0.9628556,0.0008062013,0.0002051098,0.0001275416,0.0000309653,0.00004711888,0.03114778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5659825,0.003310634,0.4126107,0.0007040491,0.0005605182,0.0007603544,0.0001313179,0.0001021731,0.01583768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007171478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03114587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01683143752504655,"score_gpt":0.2145826911482474,"score_spread":0.1977512536232008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}