{"id":"W2065536288","doi":"10.1139/f03-139","title":"Trophic structure and energy flow in backwater lakes of two large floodplain rivers assessed using stable isotopes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Trophic level; Floodplain; Macrophyte; Environmental science; Detritus; Stable isotope ratio; Benthic zone; Plankton; Ecology; Food web; Isotope analysis; Primary producers; Habitat; Isotopes of carbon; δ15N; Phytoplankton; δ13C; Biology; Nutrient; Total organic carbon","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003971834,0.00008875105,0.0002244686,0.0001551545,0.0001987581,0.00007666358,0.000192558,0.00003814742,0.0005205157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006848216,0.00006833761,0.00002547513,0.0003438828,0.0007219148,0.0004734032,0.00002735727,0.00007318913,3.99299e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009392062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002351578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02581317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4341766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990908,0.00005733599,0.0002649417,0.0001402331,0.0001649963,0.0002816861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995773,0.00003675121,0.0001481962,0.00006240639,0.000009407144,0.0001659253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006593483,0.00001600953,0.9719034,0.000007974362,0.00002056712,0.00008652182,0.002036418,0.01882526,0.003878842,0.0003194457,0.00007601058,0.00282294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007983223,0.002248092,0.7121613,0.0005167507,0.0003352058,0.000990861,0.01976756,0.1309594,0.01478931,0.09790926,0.01069079,0.00164819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986936,0.0001640533,0.000293107,0.0004923757,0.00008454412,0.0000245174,0.000005773137,6.822966e-7,0.0002413072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932804,0.00002891447,0.006483569,0.0001562301,0.00001582118,2.985965e-7,3.976086e-7,0.00000334865,0.00003109775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4083634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009672279960136499,"score_gpt":0.208642933870809,"score_spread":0.1989706539106725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}