{"id":"W2065540911","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2013.769933","title":"Applicability and Feasibility of Systematic Review for Performing Evidence-Based Risk Assessment in Food and Feed Safety","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Food safety; Risk analysis (engineering); Systematic review; Medicine; Environmental health; Biotechnology; MEDLINE; Food science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0174567,0.0003504285,0.003057248,0.00007556962,0.0002846525,0.00008454236,0.0003681255,0.0001803561,0.000006230492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207716,0.0001499097,0.0002547881,0.001079267,0.0009138116,0.000382048,0.0001397513,0.0003701048,5.974538e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000168205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001022212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001349721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001383129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951503,0.001189698,0.001876832,0.000948922,0.0004232744,0.0004109988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948514,0.004002776,0.0004554043,0.0002379002,0.0002537262,0.0001987528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001399983,0.000140995,0.00003496905,0.7016657,0.000002407273,1.373791e-7,0.000004722552,7.063203e-9,0.00001797082,0.0008365074,0.000002737895,0.2972798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003264528,0.003122889,0.0006914285,0.9727637,0.0004468261,0.00001186689,0.00004250512,0.0001185055,0.000007473344,0.002095287,0.01994327,0.0004298149],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00153899,0.9888443,0.00004555245,0.0007308052,0.00003482453,0.00866206,0.0001202955,0.00000929615,0.00001383042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03145978,0.9663046,0.0006194328,0.00013136,0.00003319931,0.001431362,0.00001796261,0.000001925574,3.615515e-7],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.29685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1838461772241989,"score_gpt":0.4074702508723463,"score_spread":0.2236240736481473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}