{"id":"W2065540911","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2013.769933","title":"Applicability and Feasibility of Systematic Review for Performing Evidence-Based Risk Assessment in Food and Feed Safety","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Food safety; Risk analysis (engineering); Systematic review; Medicine; Environmental health; Biotechnology; MEDLINE; Food science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6635001,0.003595336,0.01345228,0.0323537,0.003426151,0.01821652,0.005030535,0.01154833,0.01016506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8817962,0.003614569,0.02208054,0.02948809,0.007947669,0.02804172,0.01127429,0.007331307,0.001815453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01935887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04874803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006052405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01003131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1949159,0.6366814,0.09174673,0.01438901,0.06039771,0.001869326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09689862,0.807774,0.03028105,0.02543201,0.03770878,0.001905498],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00197423,0.0001270452,0.009733408,0.6159353,0.03868083,0.0004950226,0.003249665,0.00374725,0.0004601497,0.02903679,0.009334954,0.2872254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002979344,0.001389845,0.01321941,0.744317,0.05832597,0.001317327,0.002723995,0.0102202,0.0007803856,0.09397189,0.07025596,0.0004987007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007399009,0.7836361,0.0995272,0.04439704,0.004751814,0.03468176,0.003286749,0.0003671026,0.0219532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3025665,0.2781897,0.3115941,0.01454086,0.002732782,0.08654995,0.002076689,0.0003331881,0.001416222],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3364999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4149643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1838461772241989,"score_gpt":0.4074702508723463,"score_spread":0.2236240736481473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}