{"id":"W2065594418","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2010)24:2(203)","title":"Automated Code Compliance Checking for Building Envelope Design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Envelope (radar); Building code; Building envelope; Building design; Computer science; Code (set theory); Representation (politics); Process (computing); Building information modeling; Software; Building model; Software engineering; Engineering; Programming language; Architectural engineering; Simulation; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005980908,0.000148355,0.0002464523,0.0002757484,0.00004317557,0.00006053558,0.0001814228,0.00009786824,0.000006843708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001486367,0.0001555965,0.00007481268,0.0002410158,0.00001241778,0.0001759553,0.00001276412,0.0005264812,9.883178e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007801747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003208384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.154795e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001286703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989898,0.000009621375,0.0005397066,0.00008762733,0.0001323093,0.0002408912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.0002246308,0.0001250665,0.00008666157,0.0001246813,0.00006111523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004928845,0.000006444669,0.0003762943,0.00007622524,0.00002237065,0.000004156474,0.0001464514,0.9140741,0.08117563,0.000728566,0.0001766691,0.003208183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000410011,0.00002568103,0.003009329,0.000368603,0.000008031551,0.0001763231,0.00001827881,0.9804088,0.01415921,0.00009214231,0.001163555,0.00016],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2568603,0.0001041883,0.740725,0.0000178705,0.001802953,0.00008238816,8.996008e-7,0.0002754766,0.0001308939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8038202,0.000006178873,0.1958779,0.000006689694,0.0002544698,0.00000211209,3.976016e-7,0.00002957284,0.000002529891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6345043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02257099712718101,"score_gpt":0.2565851507594705,"score_spread":0.2340141536322895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}