{"id":"W2065715873","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.009","title":"A hybrid inexact optimization approach for solid waste management in the city of Foshan, China","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Interval (graph theory); Municipal solid waste; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Solid waste management; Term (time); China; Integer (computer science); Linear programming; Operations research; Computer science; Waste management; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004202238,0.000168404,0.0002117226,0.0002865191,0.00003952073,0.00003934194,0.0003540766,0.00002420267,0.00002433753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001505102,0.00013177,0.0001221766,0.000123861,0.00002115096,0.0002242815,0.00005293124,0.00009819015,6.01975e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.549072e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.496687e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.02048e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987682,0.00003063066,0.000530318,0.0001241816,0.0003444218,0.0002022266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995638,0.000008344597,0.0001995353,0.0001928925,0.00000432793,0.00003114697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062832,0.0002973204,0.0001128431,0.0001239612,0.00013667,0.00001617211,0.0002426622,0.9901358,0.00004446057,0.0001772113,0.0004517,0.008198326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003184122,0.0004986871,0.01668831,0.0001004386,0.0003431677,0.00001602406,0.001420892,0.9743259,0.0007135204,0.0007035387,0.0016626,0.0003427805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1267477,0.0002573646,0.8557948,0.0001310272,0.0001182139,0.001261568,0.000007987574,0.00001998489,0.01566133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568278,0.0006156994,0.04217424,0.00007675021,0.00006265791,0.00001877058,0.00002873783,0.00001758342,0.0001777511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006665678974662467,"score_gpt":0.1860608783130675,"score_spread":0.1793951993384051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}