{"id":"W2065786451","doi":"10.1115/omae2009-79177","title":"An Investigation Into the Behaviour of Composite Repaired Pipelines Under Combined Internal Pressure and Bending","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Internal pressure; Composite number; Pipeline transport; Bending; Materials science; Structural engineering; Stiffness; Bending stiffness; Hydrostatic pressure; Corrosion; Finite element method; Composite material; Stress (linguistics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001140138,0.00008207908,0.0001200841,0.00004616967,0.00005849524,0.00003328063,0.0001075329,0.00006468765,0.0000408576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001057679,0.00005325648,0.00004487921,0.0001054485,0.00007770849,0.0001422141,0.00001148503,0.0001296408,4.369849e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008457826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002983403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007846847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002300874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99951,0.00003283632,0.0001948446,0.00009960686,0.00009173484,0.00007091383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996924,0.00003556434,0.00002784615,0.0001557029,0.00004600325,0.00004242278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001197713,0.0001049566,0.1646613,0.0002450602,0.0006484064,0.000003466428,0.01777394,0.2512648,0.5310618,0.01509372,0.001194457,0.01782832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002524523,0.0001298358,0.366973,0.00005493771,0.0002517432,0.000006945701,0.001159523,0.5360838,0.08429734,0.01060651,0.00001782471,0.0001660811],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976783,0.0002135252,0.001051826,0.0006617711,0.00006434137,0.00005699972,0.000001524811,0.0001011006,0.0001705891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985147,0.00002311046,0.001244031,0.00008596583,0.00002814771,9.545009e-7,0.00001019915,0.000004450439,0.00008847449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4467645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2171736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01045729829440401,"score_gpt":0.2383062850993433,"score_spread":0.2278489868049393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}