{"id":"W2065849707","doi":"10.1007/s10651-013-0239-2","title":"Accounting for matching uncertainty in two stage capture–recapture experiments using photographic measurements of natural marks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","topic":"Census and Population Estimation","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Matching (statistics); Computer science; Bayesian probability; Population; Set (abstract data type); Data set; Sampling (signal processing); Identification (biology); Multivariate statistics; Data mining; Statistics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002017158,0.0001381574,0.0002102107,0.00004138655,0.00009781801,0.0000228117,0.0000553005,0.00005989623,0.0004627924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006534006,0.0001125362,0.00003229062,0.00003478774,0.00006459096,0.000100403,0.00004996647,0.0001085017,0.000001686208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009303886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004009257,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003457506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001308654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999051,0.00004456578,0.000347467,0.0001774939,0.0001748148,0.0002045995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999469,0.0002195399,0.0001868797,0.00006966693,0.00001068398,0.00004419423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001570277,0.00115104,0.861913,0.0004135123,0.0001079327,0.000007150143,0.002533701,0.005969631,0.113272,0.006164323,0.0003091094,0.008001624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002606192,0.0001161508,0.7793553,0.00006502819,0.00005999324,0.000005976562,0.00136844,0.1440899,0.0009073113,0.07089345,0.00005546663,0.0004767583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991597,0.00005672175,0.007490781,0.0000105017,0.00008635285,0.0005708309,0.0001330464,0.00000881776,0.00004597949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259435,0.000005529555,0.07381517,0.00005343718,0.00001514986,0.00003359357,0.00008695439,0.00001038578,0.00003625238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1381203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05655298575081629,"score_gpt":0.3204691055714712,"score_spread":0.2639161198206549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}