{"id":"W2065883168","doi":"10.1155/2012/931416","title":"Secondary Analysis under Cohort Sampling Designs Using Conditional Likelihood","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Probability and Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos; European Commission","keywords":"Covariate; Inverse probability weighting; Statistics; Event (particle physics); Cohort; Mathematics; Sampling (signal processing); Econometrics; Weighting; Inverse probability; Estimator; Computer science; Medicine; Bayesian probability; Posterior probability","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1168928,0.001798193,0.003129041,0.003163437,0.001050782,0.002473862,0.003995518,0.002565344,0.008735147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2383621,0.0009634321,0.00365599,0.003362416,0.002670327,0.003572496,0.003813786,0.003517722,0.001229395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00158677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003544878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002040402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001692056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9069087,0.08162362,0.002064569,0.004397287,0.004323696,0.0006820063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7462229,0.2197815,0.008478579,0.01712819,0.007457539,0.0009314864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001379535,0.0003994205,0.01465353,0.001985619,0.001920176,0.0006067122,0.001383463,0.09609415,0.001452536,0.6856987,0.008919743,0.1855065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005709509,0.0005516934,0.003217424,0.0003221855,0.0004750885,0.0003657337,0.0001400546,0.3664252,0.001160666,0.617184,0.009496178,0.00009086397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002571382,0.000226871,0.9956546,0.000210595,0.00005383614,0.0004166054,0.0001882664,0.000107773,0.0005700254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1119107,0.0007531293,0.878485,0.0004304805,0.0002666755,0.004640457,0.0008727072,0.0001580639,0.002482947],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1168928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6181958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1775559486848967,"score_gpt":0.4108769136756564,"score_spread":0.2333209649907597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}