{"id":"W2065894670","doi":"10.13031/2013.24100","title":"Water Quality Modeling of Two Agricultural Fields in Southern Quebec Using SWAT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the ASABE","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Tile drainage; Environmental science; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Hydrology (agriculture); SWAT model; Water quality; Surface runoff; Drainage; Phosphorus; Watershed; Nitrate; Soil water; Soil science; Streamflow; Geology; Ecology; Drainage basin; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001517049,0.0003805829,0.0002297982,0.0004814347,0.0007265135,0.0007583047,0.000636553,0.0003823174,0.001308311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004109194,0.0002224666,0.0002833933,0.0008298833,0.0003773966,0.0002967267,0.0002383057,0.0002948239,0.0001510042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01186734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004189752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999038,0.00001132911,0.000003448291,0.00002759863,0.00002276532,0.00003108204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997478,0.0000361396,0.00002573781,0.00001475266,0.0001351702,0.00004040393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002566605,0.0003089248,0.2724906,0.00005604106,0.0001199284,0.0003730563,0.0003510345,0.6811504,0.008880932,0.0006813962,0.003936789,0.03139423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004087424,0.00002654166,0.1605774,0.000006685652,0.00001620685,0.00001188922,0.0001828488,0.8368077,0.0007376062,0.00009918389,0.001471503,0.00002148532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948964,0.00003889172,0.001664547,0.000102922,0.000004198847,0.0000262572,0.001644818,0.0001436085,0.001478511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951652,0.00003436549,0.001755733,0.00002032416,0.000001678485,0.0000218203,0.001726708,0.00001150825,0.001262555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02277088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08610404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0237087728824458,"score_gpt":0.2603964837401269,"score_spread":0.2366877108576811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}