{"id":"W2066032058","doi":"10.1007/s10551-010-0639-2","title":"Actuaries, Conflicts of Interest and Professional Independence: The Case of James Hardie Industries Limited","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Independence (probability theory); Conflict of interest; Compromise; Restructuring; Quality of Life Research; Public interest; Professional ethics; Dissenting opinion; Corporate governance; Public relations; Professional conduct; Professional association; Sociology; Law; Management; Political science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976458,0.0003334529,0.0006143908,0.001079635,0.03392763,0.01604006,0.002156805,0.02179653,0.01100052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01802792,0.001063252,0.0004465865,0.0007917355,0.01481241,0.006092444,0.009666838,0.01773391,0.0008895955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01112903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02510362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09279758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2046858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931043,0.002160704,0.0002275164,0.000727452,0.0008669806,0.002913043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777299,0.01305497,0.001036984,0.0004304369,0.0009034027,0.006844296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001449497,0.000319174,0.01222211,0.00007378074,0.00007296541,0.02999065,0.1109559,0.00105649,0.001069467,0.7298352,0.08703586,0.02722331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008072139,0.0001499445,0.01048304,0.0006351246,0.00009499673,0.01074229,0.1502783,0.002236964,0.001275112,0.1731412,0.6505432,0.00033922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3711126,0.005053632,0.002563005,0.306155,0.0007518606,0.0000926551,0.00003948483,0.00003839844,0.3141934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8377023,0.001589146,0.0009116516,0.04912723,0.0003777725,0.00007921952,0.000008359372,0.00004691507,0.1101573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09279758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1845149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1368161124681146,"score_gpt":0.2908897784838043,"score_spread":0.1540736660156896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}