{"id":"W2066127744","doi":"10.5589/q06-007","title":"Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Non-Traditional Supersonic Projectiles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian aeronautics and space journal","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Missile; Freestream; Supersonic speed; Mach number; Aerodynamics; Aerospace engineering; Angle of attack; Vortex; Projectile; Crosswind; Computational fluid dynamics; Engineering; Mechanics; Physics; Reynolds number","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001212046,0.0001359416,0.0002273564,0.0006419496,0.0001333432,0.00007988205,0.00009280779,0.00006944535,0.00005623256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006427585,0.0001438279,0.0001197878,0.0004771326,0.00005597101,0.00007472432,0.000007394389,0.0001906086,0.000001527938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003010185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002358947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003024632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1620343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991812,0.000009647305,0.0002520995,0.0001096611,0.0001749228,0.0002724397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999512,0.00004120592,0.00003682529,0.00008435667,0.0000891446,0.0002364812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004801434,0.00003364637,0.009937,0.00004168155,0.0009337271,0.00006301793,0.0002036439,0.9590554,0.004562244,0.0216835,0.001649381,0.001832001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001350321,0.000021217,0.1951974,0.00001204956,0.0001785911,0.00005056911,0.00005738606,0.8029194,0.00000551183,0.0008436549,0.0004497076,0.0001294317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892398,0.000519213,0.00804121,0.0003026378,0.0002134943,0.00005858653,0.0002536128,0.0000143673,0.001357105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979438,0.0001951413,0.001507576,0.00002574459,0.00006649963,0.000001310148,0.0001137298,0.00001955248,0.0001266962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1852604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004792199270275741,"score_gpt":0.1817787891494885,"score_spread":0.1769865898792127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}