{"id":"W2066232730","doi":"10.1080/14702540802425253","title":"The elephant in the forest and the irony of the environmental debate in Québec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish Geographical Journal","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Taiga; Realm; Forest management; Geography; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Forestry; Archaeology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002069013,0.00008823265,0.0001645086,0.00004093644,0.002313588,0.0000804224,0.0006029149,0.00006292414,0.00001739303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283251,0.00003470305,0.0001604449,0.0004090127,0.005255164,0.00007327017,0.00009068732,0.0005633656,9.651778e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006795367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001046022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03871059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.459584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978626,0.0008249767,0.0002964879,0.00009911585,0.0005845144,0.0003323178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.0007848695,0.0001270386,0.0001200419,0.00001332437,0.00004940862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004446396,0.00008088189,0.9383182,0.000001083045,0.00004329702,0.00001981569,0.03896409,0.00001144422,0.000005602133,0.01567927,0.001785487,0.005046376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006116234,0.00002151055,0.9594887,0.00001748935,0.00001537305,0.000024963,0.008016431,0.00002187934,6.490287e-7,0.008845881,0.02287921,0.00005627294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654632,0.01443061,0.000001476762,0.01741434,0.0002201656,0.0002324404,0.000002415519,0.000002916974,0.002232414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978267,0.0209896,0.000003709818,0.0004737139,0.0001484178,0.00001139162,1.201579e-7,0.000003786499,0.0001023251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4208734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01022847987753062,"score_gpt":0.207474921282426,"score_spread":0.1972464414048954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}