{"id":"W2066333016","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2012.02.014","title":"Development of a submerged aquatic vegetation community index of biotic integrity for use in Lake Ontario coastal wetlands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Index of biological integrity; Wetland; Species richness; Biotic index; Ecology; Marsh; Environmental science; Aquatic plant; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Water quality; Biological integrity; Fishery; Macrophyte; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009519155,0.0003347177,0.0002551433,0.001056764,0.0008545935,0.001074484,0.0005707034,0.0002444012,0.0006486072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001690901,0.0002002539,0.0003509138,0.001313766,0.0002308611,0.0004531473,0.000489386,0.0002160951,0.0001151519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005308271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7354788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9087723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995968,0.00006885403,0.00003199824,0.00006155893,0.0001853383,0.00005551418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.00009021923,0.0002074927,0.00002917537,0.000777964,0.0001294937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002294663,0.0001217645,0.9600849,0.00006876456,0.00009502015,0.00004855636,0.001005287,0.0005607944,0.004446024,0.0001016426,0.0006541922,0.03258357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009059351,0.00009818974,0.995361,0.00001574574,0.00003986494,0.00001712408,0.0006578328,0.002399675,0.0005867372,0.00002348235,0.0007818181,0.000009511455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969098,0.00008392482,0.0006343052,0.0000472129,0.000003393789,0.000106332,0.0007589519,0.00001022867,0.00144585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945486,0.0001164191,0.003369541,0.00001641353,0.000003005069,0.0001218579,0.0007835097,0.000004798544,0.001035905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7354788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.099580709971632,"score_gpt":0.3278946615998884,"score_spread":0.2283139516282565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}