{"id":"W2066385773","doi":"10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.00969","title":"ROBUST STABILIZATION OF AN INVERTED PENDULUM USING A SLOW-FAST DECOMPOSITION APPROACH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Inverted pendulum; Diagonal; Double inverted pendulum; Controller (irrigation); Dimension (graph theory); Decomposition; Mathematics; Computer science; Control engineering; Engineering; Nonlinear system; Physics; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003902648,0.0009493501,0.0006804139,0.0005839159,0.0003983965,0.0006229091,0.000359983,0.0004628411,0.002071547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004343915,0.0002702722,0.0006109652,0.000279167,0.0003615839,0.0005217057,0.0009903394,0.00045903,0.0003304251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002549809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003562635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001144381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001199482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999898,0.00002528919,0.000006674817,0.00002189574,0.00003170366,0.00001642349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998943,0.00002469604,0.0000178686,0.00001495252,0.00003735654,0.00001087825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004585018,0.00009347756,0.000351617,0.0002396394,0.000108078,0.0001363189,0.0001009015,0.7194403,0.08384985,0.05431853,0.002012406,0.1388904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009529327,0.00009447107,0.00008451116,0.000005076005,0.000008484026,0.00001125266,0.000006734999,0.9935349,0.00166985,0.004042455,0.0005266819,0.000006035545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02506826,0.0001934606,0.9712489,0.00007645698,0.00006975896,0.00001974023,0.00003607951,0.0001090436,0.003178176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7994909,0.0004531649,0.1928055,0.00007751347,0.0001084361,0.0001720901,0.0001600899,0.00008342767,0.00664885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002071547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006930053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02344100017799085,"score_gpt":0.2287265165390024,"score_spread":0.2052855163610115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}