{"id":"W2066394042","doi":"10.1007/s00267-007-9017-y","title":"Strategic Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in the Canadian Agricultural Sector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"BIOCAP Canada; Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Accountability; Environmental economics; Stakeholder engagement; Environmental science; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002923728,0.0007291798,0.0003971497,0.002234972,0.003222107,0.003142107,0.00120177,0.0009629049,0.002546679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003784016,0.0002455937,0.0004523967,0.003040249,0.001317848,0.0009216829,0.0008664931,0.0008529693,0.0001257051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08495759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1350458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971656,0.000605722,0.00004264419,0.00009697376,0.001320545,0.0007685157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985025,0.0002068059,0.00006317892,0.00002712346,0.00102185,0.0001785029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009163224,0.0003834315,0.05472136,0.0006093972,0.0003065978,0.0009304887,0.001495559,0.4842785,0.004549206,0.2185305,0.05742602,0.1758525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043622,0.0005857016,0.2033662,0.0005246634,0.000759932,0.0002235837,0.03166027,0.4485976,0.007831966,0.1232707,0.1823768,0.0003984167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6870781,0.003306315,0.005033548,0.01381432,0.00009979094,0.0005118115,0.003791267,0.00009652461,0.2862684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872203,0.001019501,0.002960081,0.0003515992,0.00001080022,0.00003983583,0.0004402858,0.000008193882,0.007949322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08495759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6164134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01176295478546793,"score_gpt":0.2426969014833522,"score_spread":0.2309339466978842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}