{"id":"W2066394042","doi":"10.1007/s00267-007-9017-y","title":"Strategic Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in the Canadian Agricultural Sector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"BIOCAP Canada; Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Stakeholder; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Accountability; Environmental economics; Stakeholder engagement; Environmental science; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008720132,0.0003441095,0.0002295264,0.0001288817,0.0004001567,0.00005677438,0.000553148,0.0001234748,0.002725425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000146679,0.0002734429,0.0001432361,0.0002712157,0.0004720347,0.0003559438,0.0002449151,0.0003156021,0.0003192626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002608498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009532525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05842586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970104,0.0001563916,0.0005639357,0.0004822467,0.001054854,0.0007321807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990791,0.00004638686,0.0001918343,0.000422507,6.10843e-7,0.0002595305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003060542,0.002772463,0.9400123,0.00003348435,0.0001552888,0.0002584472,0.002791045,0.003001839,0.03658051,0.004671298,0.0006163479,0.009076309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006407321,0.000162303,0.9886129,0.00001260051,0.0000474006,0.0000122105,0.007813771,0.0001271891,0.0003105198,0.0006602886,0.001285533,0.0003145111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392902,0.00003337035,0.00005552548,0.0002341745,0.0001233981,0.0009677426,0.00006112624,0.00001737778,0.0592171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972261,0.000146246,0.001307665,0.0003387286,0.00004923184,0.00006721535,0.0001951284,0.0000276282,0.0006420398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05857506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01176295478546793,"score_gpt":0.2426969014833522,"score_spread":0.2309339466978842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}