{"id":"W2066431541","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18501.x","title":"Partitioning the effects of species loss on community variability using multi‐level selection theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Università degli Studi di Firenze","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Context (archaeology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Biology; Community; Global biodiversity; Species diversity; Group selection; Ecosystem; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008928258,0.00005664379,0.00006880506,0.000009260373,0.0006047638,0.000006135711,0.0001009352,0.00004583392,0.0002748856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006488492,0.00004052429,0.00002602572,0.00008193035,0.0004462126,0.00005751962,0.00007746786,0.0003130194,0.00002455087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003942753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004514086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001634755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992769,0.0003898601,0.00009042333,0.0000771941,0.00007211534,0.00009346996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986514,0.001108471,0.00006220171,0.0001528466,0.0000112127,0.00001390262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001961834,0.0002740259,0.9019608,0.00002676831,0.00002343639,3.779723e-7,0.002201866,0.001761912,0.0796046,0.01333359,0.00002793373,0.0007649991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001359146,0.00004167736,0.9792538,0.000006977561,0.00001383862,0.00000165602,0.0001008174,0.003735274,0.009324889,0.007300457,0.0000363382,0.00004835533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989934,0.000001386523,0.006261556,0.00005376064,0.0002099075,0.0001202031,0.000002419001,0.00001311442,0.003403707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985194,0.0000022565,0.001081428,0.00008796333,0.00001467399,0.000010213,0.000001133562,0.000003283624,0.000279696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07729293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4651415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02119301031688823,"score_gpt":0.2586531972190126,"score_spread":0.2374601869021244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}