{"id":"W2066455950","doi":"10.1109/tse.2015.2448531","title":"Assessing the Refactorability of Software Clones","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Code refactoring; Computer science; clone (Java method); Maintainability; Programming language; Software maintenance; Code (set theory); Software evolution; Cloning (programming); Source code; Software; Software system; Software engineering; Set (abstract data type); Software construction; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008166065,0.0002686468,0.0002837132,0.0002656952,0.0001310689,0.0001962207,0.001083481,0.0001250799,0.00001211606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001047227,0.0002208395,0.0001584063,0.001010189,0.0000692776,0.0008965799,0.0000151802,0.0005967611,0.0000326832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002179232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002006541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004043386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002254814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978968,0.00007304712,0.000382801,0.0004322637,0.0007644237,0.0004506778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962374,0.002017919,0.00006928215,0.00116768,0.0002789163,0.0002287879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001216426,0.0002033491,0.005259399,0.0001754039,0.0001086796,0.00002120161,0.001238265,0.9566103,0.0006891559,0.000172274,0.0002268054,0.03528304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005388488,0.001640557,0.1618603,0.00150611,0.0002209013,0.000478443,0.000786723,0.4464217,0.3651302,0.001127321,0.01050112,0.004938119],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1109744,0.0001177883,0.8861265,0.00007514506,0.00133099,0.0001929854,0.000007953789,0.001169006,0.000005233877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554605,0.000005248028,0.144337,0.00002081687,0.00004837179,0.00004942337,7.964526e-7,0.0000386281,0.00003921387],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.744486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9005573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04831237494271141,"score_gpt":0.3005763212471097,"score_spread":0.2522639463043983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}