{"id":"W2066555278","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.007","title":"The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Discrete choice; Scrutiny; Market penetration; Preference; Alternative fuel vehicle; Consumer behaviour; Theory of planned behavior; Marketing; Economics; Driving range; Electric vehicle; Environmental economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001518106,0.000150595,0.0002293709,0.00003968952,0.0002676919,0.00002612674,0.0002375306,0.000188643,0.00004270577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002013895,0.0001053098,0.00007915403,0.00005921811,0.0002590891,0.00008452915,0.00003241766,0.0001377489,0.00002588409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001572288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003242393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01097045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990265,0.00003098576,0.0003426203,0.0002438622,0.00003435548,0.0003216745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0013369,0.0001171267,0.0001845266,0.000007660528,0.00004158393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389676,0.000117205,0.3654007,0.00001552072,0.00007212369,0.00000584833,0.0002047977,0.2684472,0.00003627654,0.316494,0.0001752824,0.04889216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003603907,0.0007859824,0.657325,0.00001449298,0.00004083623,0.000005931723,0.00111682,0.1547309,0.002234002,0.1190291,0.06036706,0.0007459951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942768,0.0001516057,0.00009798008,0.0006114825,0.0001281516,0.0002408162,0.00001170625,0.0001327484,0.004348763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976436,0.001021816,0.0005233507,0.0001237141,0.00003509739,0.0001020732,0.00002420174,0.00001404662,0.0005120756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2919242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01919269149006924,"score_gpt":0.2299593888287355,"score_spread":0.2107666973386663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}