{"id":"W2066684393","doi":"10.4296/cwrj3204303","title":"Establishing a Rural Groundwater Monitoring Network Using Existing Wells: West Nose Creek Pilot Study, Alberta","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Groundwater; Aquifer; Watershed; Environmental science; Water resource management; Hydrology (agriculture); Water well; Water quality; Water supply; Environmental monitoring; Watershed management; Environmental resource management; Environmental engineering; Geology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00232674,0.0005520909,0.0004008588,0.001203715,0.004162888,0.0008916142,0.001415483,0.0006390976,0.0009358012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001600719,0.0005404977,0.0002696748,0.001884356,0.001246832,0.0005562882,0.0009078688,0.0006072521,0.000199788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02628916,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8899741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9693262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982597,0.0003755526,0.00005102259,0.0002053435,0.0006880172,0.0004202769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804,0.0002176309,0.0001779658,0.0001364651,0.0009096434,0.000518184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001980369,0.02040705,0.735583,0.0004924809,0.000114318,0.007090996,0.0280828,0.004614121,0.05603107,0.002445408,0.005081714,0.1380766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006681084,0.009700458,0.9121103,0.00006321751,0.0001530737,0.0009575497,0.04550706,0.00613691,0.008270374,0.0004127074,0.015884,0.0001362617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934145,0.0000561663,0.001168484,0.000181667,0.000008502923,0.002070583,0.000314966,0.00003260806,0.002752366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755833,0.0003310471,0.01513453,0.0003344508,0.000018076,0.001436611,0.001072318,0.00002037011,0.006069419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1100259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2213477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03458245402863552,"score_gpt":0.238166465167742,"score_spread":0.2035840111391065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}