{"id":"W2066797629","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.06.008","title":"Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee–ankle–foot orthosis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biomechanics","topic":"Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Ankle; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Foot (prosody); Range of motion; Gait; Kinematics; Knee Joint; Physical therapy; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001951962,0.0007031913,0.0006250773,0.0008176858,0.0002631088,0.0003372684,0.000933453,0.0006560861,0.005447097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002508289,0.0003297573,0.0004365443,0.0004373974,0.0004102472,0.0006779103,0.000476123,0.0003433303,0.0006093982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001799079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004299448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001145493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001547115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989323,0.0002343246,0.0001991124,0.0001022917,0.0004324823,0.00009941612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983665,0.0005045205,0.0001249299,0.0001324621,0.0006937158,0.0001777891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04030783,0.01525259,0.0311734,0.001157813,0.0003327445,0.001228484,0.0006834986,0.003789344,0.5820969,0.0005953917,0.001654744,0.3217272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01451433,0.3090489,0.3308775,0.0002873417,0.001709124,0.009310901,0.0009875646,0.06025175,0.2558291,0.001015484,0.01592018,0.0002478766],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685442,0.0005098639,0.02789043,0.0001703912,0.0001920105,0.0004044896,0.0005419831,0.0001170531,0.001629627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778329,0.0002563699,0.01901517,0.0001145359,0.00005515631,0.0001576283,0.0007600665,0.00003442547,0.001773803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005447097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01822233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09283726018758008,"score_gpt":0.4377257622261341,"score_spread":0.344888502038554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}