{"id":"W2066821119","doi":"10.1504/ijem.2008.019906","title":"A conceptual model of disasters encompassing multiple stakeholder domains","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Emergency Management","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Emergency management; Conceptual model; Stakeholder; Ontology; Computer science; Critical infrastructure; Knowledge management; Computer security; Process management; Preparedness; Risk analysis (engineering); Conceptual framework; Resilience (materials science); Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004587703,0.001094202,0.0006484471,0.002879076,0.002791174,0.006893557,0.003514849,0.003707733,0.008334896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003394048,0.0007334833,0.001770062,0.003825241,0.00460397,0.01051294,0.004480523,0.003253615,0.0008558554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004181307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0175122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01497289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971753,0.001396611,0.0002647107,0.0004019415,0.0005031737,0.0002582394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970841,0.001324257,0.0003094662,0.0003360297,0.0005261418,0.0004198553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001485597,0.00003058137,0.0002863151,0.00007458532,0.00001478846,0.0003600111,0.002296643,0.008186238,0.0003726774,0.9832045,0.001360717,0.003797976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001204939,0.00009241735,0.0006432036,0.0003528548,0.00007600471,0.001055759,0.007341102,0.08875669,0.0005397673,0.7028993,0.1980418,0.00008044558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02561263,0.0007155354,0.8637194,0.01416624,0.0002518361,0.0007932561,0.00155854,0.0004696007,0.09271292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4050775,0.001119433,0.573049,0.001536705,0.0001164994,0.001777522,0.001882056,0.00008379711,0.01535744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0175122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03482056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05105248845200543,"score_gpt":0.2641334184383958,"score_spread":0.2130809299863904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}