{"id":"W2066828743","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11182","title":"Empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous‐scale diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical likelihood; Nuisance parameter; Statistics; Computer science; Confidence interval; Test (biology); Sensitivity (control systems); Econometrics; Scale (ratio); Empirical research; Statistical hypothesis testing; Sample size determination; Focus (optics); Sampling bias; Data mining; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1266512,0.00180751,0.003657074,0.00554559,0.0007434995,0.0050342,0.006152809,0.004153064,0.004326713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5827374,0.00139258,0.003011242,0.003381759,0.007565722,0.005635369,0.005011471,0.004450407,0.0005567608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003226558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002443625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003421091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009601877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9256036,0.06050447,0.002374623,0.004187314,0.006301858,0.001027987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2754376,0.6896301,0.0144377,0.01034953,0.008911395,0.001233643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001883002,0.0001718435,0.02554735,0.001437197,0.001217914,0.00103873,0.001136137,0.5038317,0.001440573,0.3364915,0.003234231,0.1225697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002162907,0.0003201475,0.004840855,0.0005629061,0.0002829509,0.0006495126,0.0001660246,0.8232466,0.001843104,0.1653299,0.002394346,0.0001473061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02182449,0.002507201,0.9723752,0.0007688486,0.00004533994,0.0002254669,0.0002536658,0.000332745,0.00166702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6558167,0.001804795,0.3388295,0.000432699,0.0002297256,0.0009689314,0.0007449473,0.0002253099,0.0009474407],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8733488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6698036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1915855820531473,"score_gpt":0.4032263126867279,"score_spread":0.2116407306335807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}