{"id":"W2066842476","doi":"10.1021/es026065e","title":"Distribution and Fluxes of Total and Methylmercury in Lake Superior","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Methylmercury; Biogeochemical cycle; Mercury (programming language); Water column; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Surface water; Tributary; Geochemical cycle; Environmental chemistry; Particulates; Hypolimnion; Oceanography; Geology; Ecology; Eutrophication; Chemistry; Bioaccumulation; Nutrient; Environmental engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003207164,0.00009920281,0.0001378185,0.0001027589,0.0001306807,0.000008624567,0.00008919068,0.00006226178,0.0004076916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008562944,0.00008900389,0.00001157052,0.0005018853,0.003760976,0.0002538325,0.0002258399,0.00008790704,0.00002061262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008540571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006285891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001828242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005935084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990786,0.00002150747,0.0001617476,0.000290852,0.000191129,0.0002561368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997432,0.00001909598,0.00004541062,0.0001279087,0.000001021445,0.0000633201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002324781,0.00004418692,0.6606195,0.00000178694,0.000001553393,0.000001886408,0.0002869021,0.000007690206,0.32948,0.0007557801,0.00001420645,0.008784232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000288045,0.0001273686,0.8603313,0.000006243175,0.000005967418,0.0000616917,0.001674307,0.00003061311,0.1329761,0.001104674,0.003244895,0.0001488308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982934,0.0002543119,0.00005523197,0.0001568227,0.00003264365,0.0001227371,0.00002304151,0.00001405804,0.001047771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.0001790256,0.000392033,0.00002072587,0.000001549543,0.000008789495,0.000002211387,0.000003284581,0.00006966227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1997118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005878058231686106,"score_gpt":0.2243926696650425,"score_spread":0.2185146114333563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}